Macro Metals Wins Court Order Extending Cleansing Notice Deadline for 35M Shares

Macro Metals Limited has obtained crucial Supreme Court orders to address a regulatory oversight involving cleansing notices, paving the way for the lifting of its trading suspension.

  • Supreme Court of Western Australia grants orders to rectify cleansing notice non-lodgement
  • Extension granted for compliance period related to shares issued in March and April 2025
  • Past sales of securities validated despite administrative oversight
  • Macro requests immediate lifting of voluntary trading suspension
  • No costs ordered; ASIC to be notified and database updated
An image related to Macro Metals Limited
Image source middle. ©

Background to the Compliance Issue

Macro Metals Limited (ASX – M4M), a player in the base metals mining sector, recently faced a regulatory compliance challenge that led to a voluntary suspension of its securities trading on the ASX. The issue stemmed from an inadvertent administrative oversight concerning the non-lodgement of cleansing notices, which are required under the Corporations Act 2001 to ensure transparency around share issues and sales.

Court Intervention and Orders

On 17 July 2025, the Supreme Court of Western Australia granted Macro Metals the relief it sought to rectify this oversight. The court extended the statutory period for cleansing notice compliance related to shares issued on 27 March and 22 April 2025, effectively validating the past sales of these securities despite the initial failure to lodge the required notices. This legal remedy protects the company and its shareholders from potential invalidation of those share transactions.

Implications for Trading and Investor Confidence

Following the court’s decision, Macro Metals has requested that the ASX immediately lift the voluntary suspension on its securities. The company has also committed to lodging the outstanding cleansing notice as per the court’s orders. This development is critical for restoring liquidity and confidence among investors, who had been left in limbo during the suspension period.

Regulatory and Market Considerations

The court’s orders include provisions for notifying the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which will update its records accordingly. Notably, the court did not impose any costs on Macro Metals, signaling a recognition that the breach was inadvertent rather than deliberate. However, the episode underscores the importance of rigorous compliance processes in maintaining market integrity and investor trust.

Looking Ahead

While the immediate crisis appears resolved, the company and its stakeholders will be watching closely for any further regulatory scrutiny or market reaction once trading resumes. The incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance mining companies must maintain between operational focus and regulatory adherence.

Bottom Line?

Macro Metals’ swift legal remedy clears the path for trading to resume, but investor vigilance remains key.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will Macro Metals face any further regulatory reviews or penalties beyond the court orders?
  • How will the market respond once trading resumes after the suspension?
  • What measures will Macro Metals implement to prevent future compliance oversights?