Heritage Site Dispute Threatens Equinox’s Pilbara Exploration Plans

Equinox Resources has engaged an independent heritage advisory to assess contested Aboriginal sites at its Hamersley Iron Ore Project, following a government refusal of exploration consent. The company is pursuing judicial review while reaffirming its commitment to heritage compliance and stakeholder dialogue.

  • Engagement of Judih Judih Pty Ltd for independent heritage assessment
  • Dispute over newly identified ethnographic sites by WGAC subsidiary
  • Minister declined drilling consent due to Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Committee concerns
  • Judicial review hearing scheduled for 26 September 2025
  • Hamersley Iron Ore Project holds 108.5 million tonnes inferred mineral resource
An image related to Unknown
Image source middle. ©

Background to the Heritage Dispute

Equinox Resources Limited (ASX – EQN) has recently taken a significant step in addressing a complex heritage dispute at its Hamersley Iron Ore Project in Western Australia’s Pilbara region. The company has engaged Judih Judih Pty Ltd, an independent heritage advisory firm led by Wayne Stevens, a knowledge holder from the Wintawari Guruma Aboriginal Corporation (WGAC), to conduct a fact-based assessment of contested Aboriginal heritage sites on Mining Lease M47/1450.

This move follows the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs’ refusal to consent to Equinox’s planned infill drilling program, a decision influenced by the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Committee’s (ACHC) recognition of two newly identified ethnographic sites. These sites, mapped in a 2023 survey by Yulur Heritage Services; a WGAC subsidiary; were not documented in previous heritage assessments, including those involving WGAC participation in 2012.

The Heritage Sites in Question

The two disputed sites, Wulkajarramunha Wuntu and Elinili Range, hold significant cultural importance. Wulkajarramunha Wuntu is associated with a spiritual ancestral water serpent believed to have shaped local waterways, while Elinili Range is linked to traditional songs and dreaming stories. The late Peter Stevens, a Guruma elder instrumental in native title recognition, compiled extensive archives of cultural knowledge now entrusted to Wayne Stevens, who is leading the independent review.

Equinox’s engagement of Judih Judih Pty Ltd aims to digitise and preserve these native title archives and oral histories, ensuring a comprehensive and respectful assessment that addresses concerns raised by the ACHC and government authorities.

Legal Proceedings and Project Implications

Equinox has lodged detailed submissions with the Supreme Court, supported by affidavits and independent expert evidence, seeking judicial review of the ACHC’s decision to register the two ethnographic sites over the mining lease. The hearing is scheduled for 26 September 2025, after which the company anticipates a rescheduling of related State Administrative Tribunal proceedings to ensure alignment.

The Hamersley Iron Ore Project is a substantial asset, boasting an inferred mineral resource of 108.5 million tonnes at 58% iron content. The project represents a notable opportunity for regional economic growth and employment. However, the ongoing heritage dispute and regulatory hurdles have introduced uncertainty around exploration timelines and approvals.

Commitment to Compliance and Stakeholder Engagement

Despite these challenges, Equinox Resources has reiterated its commitment to advancing the Hamersley project in full compliance with heritage legislation. The company emphasizes constructive engagement with Traditional Owners and other stakeholders, underscoring the importance of cultural heritage preservation alongside resource development.

As the independent heritage assessment progresses and legal proceedings unfold, Equinox plans to keep shareholders and the market informed of material developments.

Bottom Line?

The outcome of the heritage assessment and court ruling will be pivotal for Equinox’s Hamersley project timeline and community relations.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will the independent heritage assessment reconcile conflicting site claims and influence regulatory decisions?
  • How might the Supreme Court’s ruling reshape heritage protection protocols for mining projects in the Pilbara?
  • What are the potential impacts on project financing and development schedules if delays persist?