Metcash Misses ASX Deadline for Director Disclosure, Plans Stronger Controls

Metcash Limited has responded to an ASX query regarding the late filing of a director’s interest notice, attributing the delay to an administrative oversight and outlining plans to enhance compliance processes.

  • Late lodgement of Appendix 3Z for director Murray Jordan due to administrative oversight
  • Existing compliance measures include Directors’ Interests Register and board meeting protocols
  • Additional enhanced business control processes planned for 2026 to prevent recurrence
  • Metcash reaffirms commitment to ASX Listing Rule compliance and governance standards
  • ASX raised concerns over potential breach of Listing Rules 3.19A and 3.19B
An image related to Metcash Limited
Image source middle. ©

Background on the Late Filing

Metcash Limited, a key player in wholesale distribution on the ASX, recently addressed a compliance issue involving the late lodgement of an Appendix 3Z notice for former director Murray Jordan. The notice, which details a director’s interests upon ceasing their role, was filed 11 days past the required deadline. The ASX flagged this as a potential breach of Listing Rules 3.19A and 3.19B, which mandate timely disclosure of director interests to maintain market transparency.

Metcash’s Explanation and Existing Controls

Planned Enhancements to Compliance Processes

To prevent future lapses, Metcash is prioritizing the embedding of enhanced business control management processes within its Company Secretariat function in 2026. These improvements will involve detailed process mapping of company secretarial duties and the introduction of control self-assessments and attestations related to director disclosures. Such steps aim to strengthen governance and ensure full adherence to ASX Listing Rules.

Commitment to Governance and Market Confidence

Metcash reaffirmed its commitment to continuous improvement in governance and compliance, recognizing the critical importance of timely and accurate disclosures for investor confidence and regulatory adherence. The company’s proactive approach to addressing the ASX’s concerns signals a willingness to learn from the incident and bolster its internal controls.

Context and Market Implications

While the late filing does not appear to have immediate financial consequences, it highlights the ongoing challenges companies face in maintaining rigorous compliance with complex regulatory frameworks. For investors, the incident serves as a reminder to monitor governance practices closely, especially in sectors like wholesale distribution where transparency is key to trust.

Bottom Line?

Metcash’s swift response and planned control enhancements will be closely watched as a test of its governance resilience.

Questions in the middle?

  • Will Metcash’s enhanced controls fully prevent future disclosure delays?
  • Are there any potential penalties or further ASX actions pending for this breach?
  • How will Metcash’s governance improvements impact investor confidence over the coming year?