🧠Editorial guidelines
These Editorial Guidelines describe how content is selected, generated, classified, attributed, and published on ™middle. (operated by Middle Enterprises Pty Ltd).
The purpose of these guidelines is to provide transparency around our editorial approach while preserving consistency, independence and scalability.
1. Editorial independence
™middle. operates independently. Editorial outcomes are not influenced by advertisers, issuers, brokers, or other third parties.
We do not accept payment in exchange for coverage, suppression, prioritisation, or framing of content.
2. Sources of information
Content published on ™middle. may be derived from:
- Public market disclosures, including various global stock market announcements
- Regulatory filings and public records
- Market data, historical pricing, and volume information
- Automated classification, scoring, and signal detection systems
Primary sources are used wherever practicable. References to third-party data are provided for context and informational purposes only.
3. Editorial systems, consistency, and governance
Content on ™middle. is produced through a structured, rule-based editorial workflow designed to promote consistency, proportionality, and repeatability.
The workflow applies predefined criteria to disclosures, data, and signals to determine classification, prioritisation, and presentation. Editorial rules are documented, version controlled, and applied uniformly across comparable inputs.
A human-in-the-loop governance model is used to define, maintain, and refine these editorial rules over time. Human involvement occurs at the system and policy level, rather than through routine review of individual articles.
4. Change management and reliability
Editorial logic is designed to minimise discretionary variance by favouring defined rules and repeatable processes over subjective intervention.
Changes to classification criteria, scoring thresholds, or prioritisation logic are made deliberately and prospectively, with an emphasis on maintaining internal consistency across time and similar disclosures.
Editorial outcomes reflect the operation of the system at the time of publication. Historical content is not routinely reprocessed unless a material error or structural issue is identified.
5. Authorship and attribution
Articles published on ™middle. are attributed to named editorial personas. These personas are fictional characters used for attribution, organisation, and presentation purposes.
Named authors do not represent real individuals and should not be interpreted as specific human writers, analysts, or advisers. Attribution does not imply personal authorship, review, or endorsement by an individual.
Author personas are used to reflect editorial domains, thematic focus, or system-defined categorisation. The underlying content is generated through ™middle.’s editorial systems and governed in accordance with these guidelines.
The personas themselves are an intentional homage to contributors to the history of computing, mathematics, and systems thinking, using adapted or symbolic naming. This creative choice does not alter the informational or non-advisory nature of the content.
6. Accuracy and corrections
We aim to ensure content is accurate at the time of publication based on information reasonably available through public and automated sources.
Markets and disclosures evolve. Where material inaccuracies are identified, content may be updated, corrected, or clarified. Corrections are applied at the content or system level, as appropriate.
7. Scope and limitations
The Platform applies generalised editorial logic at scale. It is not designed to account for individual circumstances, strategies, or risk profiles.
Outputs should be interpreted as contextual information rather than definitive assessments, recommendations, or conclusions.
8. Tone and framing
Content on ™middle. is written to be factual, measured, and proportionate.
- Sensational or exaggerated language is avoided.
- Facts, interpretation, and uncertainty are distinguished where relevant.
- Forward-looking language is framed cautiously and without implication of outcomes.
9. Conflicts of interest
™middle. seeks to avoid conflicts of interest that could compromise editorial integrity.
Potential conflicts are managed through governance of editorial systems and separation from external commercial influence, rather than through case-by-case content intervention.
10. Fairness and coverage
Coverage decisions are driven by relevance, materiality, and defined editorial criteria. The absence of coverage should not be interpreted as endorsement, criticism, or assessment.
11. Forward-looking statements
Some content may reference expectations, scenarios, or interpretations based on current information. These are inherently uncertain and should not be relied upon as predictions.
12. Updates to these guidelines
These Editorial Guidelines may be updated from time to time to reflect changes in methodology, technology, or regulatory considerations.